Blog 6: The End of Paper?

I think that these e-readers will certainly bring an inevitable halt to the traditional print newspaper industry.  This may not occur within the next 5 years or so but when companies line out some effecient business models and find a way to turn over a hefty profit it will most definitely happen.  The concept is very effecient in itself and of course the environmental role it will play is enormous but companies will have to troubleshoot how they can effectively bring in revenue from their traditional methods of advertising, subscriptions etc.  From the research and the product demos the I have seen the e-readers are an amazing and very complex device in the form of a simple thin sheet of plastic.  They will provide an astounding level of convenience to the reader with the ability to provide several media and book publications with the touch of a finger.  So yes in the near future I believe that paper newspapers will come to a gradual extenction and this new media technology will take the reins, as it should. 

Blog 5: Lets Ban Books

This is ridiculous.  For not only the sake of the First Amendment and the freedom of speech but for schools and the power to educate by use of books.  This censorship against a document that has been in existence for two hundred years is clearly lacking the usage of common sense and reason.  If words have been published in something as well known as a Merriam-Webster's dictionary for that long and if they were put there in the first place for that matter there had to have been some reasonable application for it.  If parents want their children not to see curse words in the dictionary then they should do whatever they think suiting to do so but banning a dictionary is outright ludicrous.  Maybe my thoughts are not as sensitive towards parents and their relationships with their children, and maybe that is because I do not yet have children but I was raised in a generation where it was still okay to get a slap on the wrist for not taking your hat off at the table or saying a curse word you found in the dictionary.  That is sometimes what it takes to teach right from wrong and as a child I knew what that was.  But nowadays even that is "banned".  I believe that if children are raised to know what is a bad word and why it is not to be said, that that is much more conducive to preventing misbehavior than banning a book for example that may have a couple of those words or even more ridiculously a dictionary.
-Chris C

Blog 4: Poor Richard

If Passion drives, let Reason hold the reins.

This line comes from Benjamin Franklin's "Wit and Wisdom from Poor Richard's Almanack".  This excerpt has a very simple meaning or message but allows the observer to place what in their life really relates to it.  Personally I can see myself as a fairly passionate person in that I love what I do and the people that stand behind me whether that be my amazing family or my loving girlfriend who puts up with a long distance relationship with me everyday.  I believe that passion and determination are very important characteristics that every individual should place highly in their priorities but what Benjamin Franklin said about passion and the direction that one steers his passion is very important.  Being passionate about anything can in a way become harmful if overdone to the point where reason is not considered.  Franklin may have capitalized the words "Passion" and "Reason" for in this context he is referring to them as persons driving a coach or wagon.  They are italicized because obviously they are not simply names but emotions or actions.  If passion is what drives ones thoughts and actions (the coach in this instance) then he needs to make sure reason is in the driver seat steering it in a beneficial direction.  Always be reasonable even when your emotions are overwhelming.
-Chris C

Social Interaction

The subject issue that this blog covers is something that I have touched on several times in the few before and is something that I feel strongly about.  The article by Delgado, "The Internet and Social Interaction" portrays a very similar outlook as mine in regards to the internet and its effects on users and their social interactions with others.  She mentioned several times toward the end of her article that there are definite benefits to the availability and convenience of communication methods like cell phones and texting but those things cannot in the least replace the personal interaction between another being.  Facebook and others can reunite long lost friends and high school buddies but if you had the opportunity to see someone like that would you choose rather to instant message them over the internet?  No way!  At least not me.  I do not think that the internet necessarily isolates individuals from real social interaction but I think that Delgado put it very well in her statement, "How do humans bond and know each other when they are not within the physical presence of who we genuinely are; living and breathing and seeing each other interact with the world around us".  The internet can provide us an enormous amount of convenience and information, when in this day in age some people cannot use conventional methods of media, and a source of marketing especially but it will never be a replacement for a man-to-man interaction and conversation between individuals.  For instance, internet means of communication can give me the opportunity to speak to my great grandmother in New York and even maybe get to see her face, but there is nothing that can replace being able to hug her and talk to her face to face.
-Chris C

Blog 2: CBS Thought

In regards to the media correspondent Jeff Greenfield in his video dubbed "Media Convergence" I personally agree entirely with his closing statement.  It included his concern about society and users of unconventional media gathering methods in this information age needing to sustain the concepts of personal relationships and respect for history.  As I stated in my first blog I do sincerely belive that interpersonal relationships between co-workers, customers, friends and especially loved ones are very important and that it seems some people let todays convenience of other methods of communication hinder that.  These methods and the advancements made technologically in communication are utterly important to the progress of our country and economy but the priorites for things that Greenfield stated such as the love for story telling, vivid language, and a respect for history should be much higher on a personal stand point.  Individuals should find a balance in their time spent using these information and communication methods and time spent with other individuals giving them the opportunity to have intelligent and engrossing conversations.  In a more broad sense, and most likely more of what Greenfield is talking about, the reason that the media broadcast "Sunday Morning" and CBS news among other broadcasts still endure is their sense of relation to the direct viewer and priority set upon these fundamental values.
-Chris C

Blog1: Media Junkie

Don't get me wrong I use the internet frequently, especially because I recently invested in a smart phone accesible to the internet, but my usage is almost entirely educational with the occasional facebook log on. I am from a very small town in southeast Kansas and the ranch my family lives on is in the middle of nowhere and still have yet to find an internet service that would load a webpage in less than 10 minutes haha. I scored an 11 on the internet addiction which was low enough to not be classified haha but its not like I am completely technologically illiterate or against it. I believe much stronger in the fact that, as the book mentioned as well, abuse and mindless use of the internet minimalizes social interaction. I understand the convenience of conference calls, web cam meetings, and other media based communication but the personal interaction between 2 people face to face or with a group of people is a connection that cannot be immitated by other media communication channels. Enough of on my rant but atleast I covered the part of the question as to why or why not media usage is the best usage of my time. During the summers and mainly during semesters here in manhattan as well I work outside atleast 8-10 hours a day and most of the time in areas without the best cell phone service. I use the internet at nights to surf the web, log on to my facebook or listen to music but that could just be a one or two hour session. I do have a long distance relationship with my girlfriend so that adds to my cell phone usage but I limit text messages to a very minimum especially when I am working. I am a sports fan and an hour or so of watching television a day is about the maximum I can stand and I have never had a consistent show that I watched every week. To generally conclude my first blog post ever haha I would say I interact directly with a form of media about 4 or 5 hours a day and that I try to limit my usage of media to being productive and wasting a little free time.